FROM ISSUE No. 57 - JANUARY 1981

(UNDER THE TITLE "THE LOCO No. 9 APPEAL FUND")

It has been some time since we last reported in this magazine, on the situation concerning our Appeal Fund for the restoration of No. 9 Douglas.  The reason for this silence has not been because we wish to forget the matter because of the problems we have encountered, but that we have been endeavouring to obtain a successful solution which would benefit not only the Supporters' Association but moreover the railway.

To recap the matter, the I.o.M.S.R.S.A. launched an appeal for funds in the summer of 1977 for the restoration of locomotive No. 9 Douglas.  At this time, the railway was under the ownership of the Isle of Man Railway Company and an agreement was reached with them over the restoration of the locomotive boiler, with such proposed work being approved by the boiler inspector of the Railway Company.

However, during the winter of 1977/1978 the railway was purchased by the Isle of Man Government which meant that a new agreement had to be entered into with the Government Board responsible.  Following various discussions and correspondence with the M.E.R. Board various terms were concluded and preparatory work on the locomotive began.  The result of the takeover of the railway meant that a new boiler inspector was appointed and following prelimiary examination No. 19's firebox was condemned.  Following further discussions with the M.E.R. Board, we were kindly offered the boiler from loco No. 3 Pender.  Certain problems were encountered with the M.E.R. Board and it was decided that all work on No. 9 should cease until such times as these were resolved.  We discussed with the board the out-right purchase of the locomotive, but although this was approved in principle bt their Vice-Chairman we were subsequently informed in writing that:-

"...with the growth of passenger traffic the board feel they should retain No.9 as a museum item of the original type that could be returned to service at some time in the future..."

However, we were later informed by the M.E.R. Board that:-

"...the board have no knowledge of any written or condition of tenancy regarding the No.9 locomotive.  II am also instructed to advise you that any previous letters advising you that they would consider leasing or the sale of No.9 loco were rescinded by letter dated 20th March 1979, when you were advised that all priviledges and facilities afforded to your members in the past would be withdrawn..."

We therefore obtained legal advice as the committee of the Supporters' Association were of the opinion that we had a legal and binding agreement with the M.E.R. Board.  This was confirmed by our legal advisors and that the agreement was enforceable against the Board.  However, it was suggested that a letter of complaint be forwarded to the Executive Council of Tynwald.  This was done, but after a period of time had elapsed, we recieved a reply that they were not in a position to help.  As was said at the time, wheels within wheels in Government Office.  It was decided under the circumstances, not to take the matter further for the time being, hoping that in due course a situation would arise when the matter could again be brought up with the board and a meeting with the chief executive and two members of the board took place on the 24th November.  The agreement reached at the meeting was as follows:-

"...the boiler inspector has first to make an inspection of No. 11 Maitland to ascertain whether or not the proposall or retubing is worthwhile.  It is understood that a preliminary inspection has taken place and the inspector has stated that the boiler shell is sound enough for a further 10 years' service.  However, he has requested the removal of all tubes in order to carry out a further inspection.  Once this written report is to hand, through the board, a quotation will be obtained from a reputable firm in order to obtain an estimate for repairs to comply with the inspector's requirements.  If the quotation is acceptable, and the Supporters' Association has enough money, then the job will proceed..."

The board representatives and the chief executive confirmed that they will assist in providing space in the workshops for the job to be carried out, and will carry out any work required by the boiler inspector in order for him to carry out an inspection.  Mr. Peter Craine, M.E.R. Board Vice-Chairman, stated that they were not in a position at the present time, to pay for the re-tubing of No. 11 Maitland and that in his opinion the locomotive is required for service this coming summer.  The board members expressed their delight at the suggestion put forward by the Supporters' Association.

The matter now lies with the boiler inspectors and we await his report  before proceeding as outlined above.  The job is likely to cost many thousands of pounds, and therefore, if any member wishes to make a donation towards the scheme, would they please send the same to the Association Treasurer. It is hoped to make a further announcement in the next issue of this journal.